Impact of incomplete revascularization following OPCAB surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY The aim of this study was to evaluate the early and mid-term off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB) results in a single surgical unit, assessing the impact of completeness of revascularization. METHODS Three hundred and twelve patients underwent OPCAB between August 2000 and January 2005. In-hospital data were collected prospectively for all patients undergoing OPCAB. Complete revascularization (CR) was derived by comparing significantly stenotic vessels at cardiac catheterization with surgically grafted coronary vessels. Grafting of all the significantly stenotic coronary vessels was considered CR. In-hospital outcomes were compared between patients with CR and incomplete revascularization (IR). A multivariate analysis based on the Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed. RESULTS Patients receiving IR (105 patients, 43.7%) presented a worse preoperative risk profile then those having CR (mean Euroscore 6.8 +/- 2.9 vs. 4.3 +/- 2.8, p < 0.0001). IR was not associated with a higher incidence of early adverse events. Five-year freedom from death and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were 0.88 (0.02 SE) and 0.86 (0.03 SE), respectively. Complete revascularization was protective for mid-term unstable angina recurrence [heart rate (HR) = 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10 to 0.58], acute myocardial infarction (HR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.73), all-cause repeat revascularization (HR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.90), and MACE (HR = 0.2, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.5). CONCLUSION Our study suggests that, although incomplete revascularization may not result in increased short-term morbidity and mortality, it increases the incidence of mid-term MACE.